How do we help people trust science they can’t check for themselves?
We study how local, trusted voices, such as Extension professionals, explain science and address misinformation in their communities.
At SciMedia Lab, we study what makes science communication work. Our researchers test messages, explore how media shape public understanding, and translate findings into communication strategies that make a difference.
We study how local, trusted voices, such as Extension professionals, explain science and address misinformation in their communities.
Our research found that family and friends can be more effective health role models than celebrities or social media stars.
We study how communities, including residents concerned about PFAS in their water, make sense of environmental science and uncertainty.
With Extension partners, we test how to communicate emerging risks like avian influenza so farm workers can take clear, protective steps.
Photos from the WSU Photo Library, except the fish photo by Hunter Brumels on Unsplash.
We study how people understand and respond to information about science, health, the environment, and risk. Our research examines how communication can build trust, inform decisions, change behavior, and help communities navigate complex challenges.
How do we communicate complex research to the people who need it? We study scientific uncertainty, misinformation, public trust, and strategies for making research meaningful beyond academic audiences.
From social media and influencers to prevention campaigns and community partnerships, we examine how messages, emotions, and social relationships influence health beliefs and behaviors.
We work at the intersection of environmental research, public understanding, and community engagement, helping people navigate issues involving water quality, agriculture, conservation, and environmental change.
Knowing something is dangerous does not always change behavior. We investigate how communication can move beyond fear, communicate uncertainty, strengthen trust, and motivate protective action.
We study how stories, emotions, role models, and the people we feel connected to through media shape what we think, feel, and do, including media that inspires us to act.
From attention and emotion to judgments of credibility, we examine how people process scientific and health information, especially when it is complex, uncertain, or competing with misinformation.
Understanding what different audiences believe, value, and trust, from agricultural producers and parents to patients and young adults.
Designing and evaluating messages that explain uncertainty, address misinformation, connect emotionally, and make research relevant to everyday decisions.
Using experiments, surveys, message testing, and social media analytics to evaluate communication strategies and improve outcomes.
Most people never read a study. They rely on someone they trust to tell them what it means. We study how local, trusted voices can explain science, address misinformation, and earn credibility.
What we look at: Trusted messengers, credibility, misinformation correction, media literacy
Working with Extension professionals across the country, we tested training in science media literacy and conversation skills to build their confidence talking with communities about vaccines.
Health messages compete with celebrities, influencers, and the people we love. We study how role models, stories, and emotion shape health goals and behavior.
What we look at: Role models, parasocial relationships, narrative, emotional appeals
We compared celebrity, social media, and personal role models and found that family and friends were more effective at inspiring health goals than famous figures.
Environmental issues can feel distant, technical, or uncertain. We study how communities make sense of environmental science and what helps them act on it.
What we look at: Uncertainty, local relevance, community engagement, inspiring media
With the West Plains Water Coalition, we are exploring how residents understand PFAS in their drinking water and how to explain what scientists know and don’t yet know.
Emerging risks like zoonotic diseases change quickly, and fear alone rarely changes behavior. We study how to communicate uncertainty and give people clear, doable steps to protect themselves.
What we look at: Uncertainty, self-efficacy, social norms, trusted messengers
With Extension partners, we tested messages about avian influenza (H5N1) for dairy workers to learn which framing and which messengers best support protective action.
Photos from the WSU Photo Library, except the fish photo by Hunter Brumels on Unsplash.
Our peer-reviewed articles and conference papers are collected on Google Scholar.
A research lab in the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication at Washington State University.
We study how people find, evaluate, and use information about science.
We contribute communication research and evaluation to interdisciplinary grants.
We host workshops and an annual summit for faculty and students.
Nicole is an associate professor in the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication. Her research centers on media psychology: how media messages shape attitudes, beliefs, and behavior, with applications to health, science, environmental, and risk communication.
She works with nonprofits and government agencies to develop, test, and evaluate campaign messages, and she loves sharing research beyond the university. If you have a communication challenge or a research idea, she would be glad to hear from you.
Open to WSU faculty, students, and Extension professionals. Dates to come.
We join grant teams to design, test, and evaluate the communication side of the work.
Public engagement activities and their evaluation.
Community engagement and message testing.
Extension and outreach with measurable outcomes.
Two or three sentences.
Agency and program.
Six weeks out is ideal.
Who needs to hear it.
Nicole O'Donnell is available to discuss SciMedia research and related topics with journalists, podcasters, and writers.
Family and friends can be more effective health role models than celebrities.
Health Communication, 2025
Viral TikTok health videos lean on influencers, not experts.
WSU study, 2023
Young viewers often trust influencer health advice more.
WSU study, 2023
Present at national conferences.
Experiments, surveys, social media data.
With communities living the issue.
Open to students from any field. Doctoral applicants apply through Murrow graduate admissions.
Join a summit panel or mentor a student.
Your campaign could become a lab project.
We spotlight alumni connecting science and the public.
Research, travel, and events through Murrow.
nicole.odonnell@wsu.edu